Barriers to transformative learning in undergraduate research: Helping student researchers to embrace the hurdles.

Sarah B Lovern

Abstract


Data shows that undergraduate research is a high impact practice utilized as an essential part of many college campuses (Sternquist et al., 2018).  Much of this influence on student success is beginning to be attributed to transformative learning within the last decade. Transformative learning involves the student in more than just learning about problems. It causes the individual to undergo significant phases of reassessment and growth that challenges old assumptions and takes the student towards higher-level thinking process and new directions (Mezirow, 1978). However, it is not an automatic transformation that occurs when a student first engages in an innovative research project. Many students falter when first exposed to the need to move up Bloom’s taxonomy from simply memorizing facts or concepts to applying them in the research setting.  Therefore, undergraduate research mentors are challenged to not only teach the discipline- based techniques and modes of inquiry, but also help students increase metacognition to aid in the transformative process. With this dual responsibility, several pitfalls in the process can be found including: 1) Time constraints on faculty and student engagement in the research process, 2) Ill-prepared students lacking in foundational knowledge who struggle to complete basic tasks, let alone move to cognitive expertise of the subject matter and the process occurring, and 3) An increase in students’ desire to participate in research solely as a pre-requisite for graduate programs. These three aspects are discussed in terms of why they exist for the student population and how mentors can help the students embrace these hurdles in an effort to gain greater understanding of why the research is beneficial to their development as an undergraduate student and a lifelong learner. This includes recognizing and identifying learning bottlenecks (Middendorf & Shopkow, 2018), overcoming student resistance, and developing a welcoming research culture that recognizes students come from a variety of frames of reference (Taylor, 2008). Mentors must help students to acknowledge how the frame of reference is unique for everyone on a team even in disciplines which are traditionally believed as completely objective. Practical guidance based in research from a variety of fields is provided for mentors to increase transformative learning growth of student researchers.


Keywords


tranformative learning; culture; undergraduate research, bottleneck, threshold concept, mentor

Full Text:

PDF 28-35

References


Angelo, T.A. (1993) A Teacher’s Dozen – Fourteen General, Research-based principles for improving higher learning in our classrooms. AAHE Bulletin, 45(8), 3-7, 13.

Christie, M., Carey, M., Robertson, A., & Grainger, P. (2015) Putting transformative learning theory into practice. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1) 9-30. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059138.pdf

Douglas, D. (2013) Undergraduate research at Fanshawe: The research wheel. Centre for Research and Innovation, Fanshawe College. Retrieved from http://www.fanshawelibrary.com/teaching-learning-research-guide/student-research/undergraduate-research-fanshawe/

Erez, M. & Gati, E. (2004) A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4) 583-598. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/50c0/14cf2c4e5095a49d5315a150cd4491f0cecd.pdf

Lopatto, D. (2004) Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(Winter) 270-277. doi: 10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045

Macaskill, A. (2012) The mental health of university students in the United

Kingdom. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 41 (4), 426-441. Retrieved from https://shura.shu.ac.uk/6449/1/

Mezirow, J. (1978) Perspective transformation. Adult Education, XXVII(2) 100-110.

Middendorf, J., & Shopkow, L. (2018) Overcoming Student Learning Bottlenecks. Stylus: Sterling, VA.

Sternquist, B., Huddleston, P., & A. Fairhurst. (2018) Framing the undergraduate research experience: Discovery involvement in retailing undergraduate education. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(1) 76-84. doi: 10.1177/0273475317753864

Taylor, E. (2008) Transformative learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, Fall 2008(119) 5-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.301

Townsend, B.K., & Rosser, V.J. (2007) Workload issues and measures of faculty productivity. Thought and Action, Fall 2007 7-19. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/archive/33193.htm

Wallin, P., Adawi, T., & Gold, J. (2016). Reflective diaries – A tool for promoting and

probing student learning. 12th International CDIO Conference. Turku, Finland. Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2016/155/155_Paper_PDF.pdf

Wallin, P., (2017) The potential of complex challenges in undergraduate research to stimulate transformative learning. Nordic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1) 307-318. doi: https://doi.org/10.5324/njsteme.v1i1.2339

Wilson, Z.S., Sylvain, M.R., & McGuire, S.Y. (2012) Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1) 148-156. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Sarah B Lovern

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.